![]() ![]() There's no point in carrying on with you. You've posted little to read, and nothing to support your case. The only stated difficulty is in finding anything you've posted that's worth reading. No where have I stated difficulty in reading. You lost it when you stooped to fabricating quotes, what you call "paraphrasing". You lost it when you asked for sources, and when shown one you can't bring up any of your own. You've lost this and that's all there is to it. One short sentence summed up your other statements. Just as you haven't shown anything independently supporting Mec-Gar's statement. No proof to contradict Mec-gar's statement. You have shown NOTHING that supports your opinion. If you wish to quote me, please do so accurately. It's just an example of the integrity of a person that concocted a false statement then attributed it to me.Īctions of low integrity such as making up false statements make it easy to dismiss anything that person has said. Mec-gar's statement is far more solid than anything you've brought up.but of course that's because you've brought up nothing as support for you postion. Yet you still contiune to ask everyone else to support their's You fall back on the "You prove I'm wrong" every time anyone asks you to support your own position. What document, even a BS internet article do you have that shows Mec-gar's statement to be not entirely correct or misleading? That's right nothing. ![]() Other than more ranting that other people need to cite sources, but of course "Lester_Long" doesn't need to. Sorry I missed the source that you cited that proved Mec-gar's statement to beĪnd we're supposed to believe Mec-Gar because of what? Because they're the MIGHTY Mec-Gar? No rant, source shown, WAY over your head. You can rant all you want, you still have shown no source, nor any support for your positon. If anything it simply weakens it because it's an indication that you indeed have no support for your theory. No amount of ranting the time-tested: It's BS because it's on the net mantra is going to do any good for your position. It's up to you to show where that statement is false or misleading as you claim it is. Mec-gar has stated what they have stated. You're the one calling BS on Mec-gar's statement. Somehow I'm supposed to take your word that Mec-gar has purposefully written on their website something: You tell us that somehow we are to believe the faceless "Lester_Long" over Mec-gar without any support or proof. You cry about sources all through this thread, but provide none yourself when asked to. You call it false and misleading, but you provide no support for your position. Because if it's on the 'net, it just HAS to be true. ARMY?īut you and your boy are right, let's believe some bullshit we all read on the 'net. Your source please? Please cite your soruce that Mec-gar's statement is false or misleading.īeretta and their subsidiary MDS supplied magazines for the original contract did they not? Checkmate supplied the additional magazines did they not? That can all be found via a net search can it not? So where is the GAO contract stating that Mec-Gar is THE OFFICIAL SUPPLIER OF BERETTA M9/92F 15 ROUND MAGAZINES FOR THE U.S. That's not entirely correct or is at the very least misleading. "Our greatest success was to be qualified as the official supplier of Beretta M9/92F 15 round magazines for the U.S. Do you have a written letter from Beretta saying that they NEVER contracted M9 magazines out to MecGar? Please post it as I would like to see your source. And if they were not marked MecGar then common sense kicks in and says that they were marked PB.īTW, since you are saying source, source, source! Where is yours saying that you are right. Ever seen a USGI M9 magazine marked Mec-Gar? Me either, but if you actually looked around on the site you would have seen that they made mags for the M9 for the US Army. The magazines were to help on a contract for Beretta. But hell, let's believe some bonehead "article" instead. Uh, ever thought of looking at the magazines? Mec-Gar 92/M9 magazines have some differences than MDS/Beretta 92/M9 magazines, whereas the 84 magazines are identical. Where is your source? Please post your source! And it staes WHERE that they were manufactured for the 92/M9? Mec-Gar produces magazines for some of Beretta's items such as the 84, but not the 92/M9. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |